Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Coffman v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia
Decided April 17, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
KEEFER, District Judge.
This case comes up upon the alternative writ of mandamus issued therein, and upon a plea of abatement interposed by respondents to said writ, setting forth that on January 15, 1901, in the circuit court for the district of West Virginia, a certain other mandamus proceeding was instituted by the relator against the respondents to compel the furnishing of cars and shipping facilities for transporting coal for the relator, and that in said proceeding the same right of the relator and the same duty on the part of respondents were alleged which are averred in the petition…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Nesbit v. Riverside Independent DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Wood v. Jackson ex dem. GenetCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
- Sayre's v. HarpoldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
- McJilton v. LoveIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ChesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Sango v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. ColeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Eppinger v. SeagravesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Stratton v. Essex County Park CommissionU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1906