Legal Opinion

(HC)Watkins v. Tuolumne County Superior Court

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 11, 2023No. 1:23-cv-01450Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND CHAD WATKINS, No. 1:23-cv-01450-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 14 TO DISMISS PREMATURE PETITION 15 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SUPERIOR [TWENTY-ONE DAY OBJECTION COURT, DEADLINE] 16 Respondent. 17 18 19 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He filed the instant habeas petition in this Court on October 10, 21 2023. Upon review of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API