Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hunger v. Grand Central Sanitation

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1996No. 135Published

1ConcurrenceBeck, Judge

I concur in the majority’s conclusion that summary judgment was properly entered in favor of defendants-appellees in this case. However, I am unable to join in the majority’s discussion of the legal principles applicable in assessing plaintiff-appellant’s claims.

Initially, I note that although this matter was adjudicated by the trial court based on appellees’ motion for summary judgment, that motion was not supported by any depositions, affidavits or other materials as provided for in Pa.R.C.P. 1035 (providing that a party may move for “summary judgment on *586the pleadings and any depositions,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Reuther v. Fowler & Williams, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Yaindl v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. Standard Pump-Aldrich DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API