Driscoll v. City of Medford
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
This bill for declaratory relief is brought to determine whether the plaintiffs are entitled to additional • compensation or time off because of services performed by them for the city of Medford in excess of forty-eight hours a week during a portion of 1949. The case was submitted on a statement of agreed facts.
The plaintiffs, with certain exceptions, are permanent members of the uniformed fire fighting force of the city of Medford, hereinafter called the city. On November 2, 1948, the voters of the city accepted G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 48, § 58B,. inserted by St. 1945, c. 413, § 1, the material…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell v. Treasurer of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Campbell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- McHenry v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Gregoire v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Walker v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bland v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Bd. of Selectmen v. MUN. COURT, CITY OF BOSTONMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Amelotte v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Donohue v. Police Commissioner of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Fransen v. Chief of PoliceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965