Legal Opinion

City of Louisville v. Louisville Home Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 21, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, Second Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle

Reversing.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court, Chancery Branch, Second Dip i si on, dismissing an action in equity brought by the city of Louisville to enjoin the Louisville Home Telephone Company from using in its telephone system in the city, what are known as party lines.

The appellee, Louisville Home Telephone Company, is operating its exchange and lines in Louisville under a franchise which was acquired by purchase of the city in the year 1900, under an ordinance authorizing its sale according to the. constitutional method.

By…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gardner v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Cumb. Tel'p & Tel'g Co. v. City of HickmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  3. Commonwealth v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Hilliard v. George G. Fetter L. & H. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  5. Duncan v. Central Passenger Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Kentucky Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. City of Owensboro v. Top Vision Cable Co. of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  3. Christian-Todd Telephone Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Lutes v. Fayette Home Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. City of Campbellsville v. Taylor County Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API