Legal Opinion
Farrell v. Moomau
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 18, 1949No. 28912-EPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERSKINE, District Judge.
■This action involves the claims of plaintiffs to injunctive relief to prevent their removal from civil service positions with the Veterans Administration. Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, or in the alternative for summary judgment. It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiffs received a notice in writing from the defendant E. B. Moomau entitled “Notice of Reduction in Force.” Said’ notice stated that each of the plaintiffs would be separated from his employment, a necessary move to •effect a reduction in force of the employees of the San Francisco District…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Williams v. FanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Payne v. Central Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Work v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reeber v. RossellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Hills v. EisenhartDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
- Hardy v. RossellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Fredericks v. RossellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Group v. FinletterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.