Legal Opinion

Foltz v. Burlington Northern Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1985No. WD 35095PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NUGENT, Judge.

Defendant, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, appeals from a verdict and judgment under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act in favor of plaintiff Ed Foltz for damages suffered as a result of defendant’s negligence. Burlington Northern claims the trial court erred in instructing the jury, that the evidence was insufficient to support submission of the case to the jury, and that the verdict is excessive. We affirm.

Mr. Foltz is a railroad employee of the defendant working as a switchman in a railyard in Kansas City. Mr. Foltz along with four other crew members was responsible…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  5. Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carl Mayhew, Jr. Diana Lee Mayhew v. Bell Steamship CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. Michael Holmes v. Bobby Lee GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  3. Qualls v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. Cupp v. National RR Passenger Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Turner v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API