Legal Opinion

United States v. Schullo

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 1, 1975No. 3-73-Cr-149PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DEVITT, Chief Judge.

This illegal gambling case, first assigned to the late Judge Philip Neville, was tried by the undersigned in February 1975, resulting in a guilty verdict.

Defendant Schullo moves for judgment of acquittal or a new trial. Argument was directed principally to a new trial on the grounds of discriminatory prosecution against Schullo because the cases against fellow defendants Horowitz and Mezo were dismissed and should have been as to him, and that Schullo was denied a fair and impartial jury because juror Joanne Adams failed to disclose on voir dire that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. United States v. Harold McMillanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. State v. Welfare of F. C. R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. United States v. BradleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. GarwoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API