Legal Opinion

Pomperaug Realty Corp. v. Schulte Real Estate Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchreiber, J.

Plaintiff mortgagor assigned to defendant mortgagee two bonds and mortgages as additional security in the event of default under the main mortgage. The agreement provided that upon such default defendant might foreclose the *1081main mortgage, or apply the proceeds of sale of the security in reduction of the principal thereof, or both.

Default occurred and, clearly, defendant then might have sold the security and applied it in reduction of the principal indebtedness. However, without doing so, defendant foreclosed the main mortgage. Indeed a defense in the foreclosure action that it should be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Rudd v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Honeyman v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Honeyman v. HananNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Rossbach v. RosenblumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. v. WagnerNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Trustco Bank v. Pearl Mont Commons, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API