Legal Opinion
Rossbach v. Rosenblum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 19, 1940PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The action is one by judgment creditors of a corporation known as Aurora Holding Corporation. It was brought pursuant to sections 60 and 61 of the General Corporation Law, to recover from the directors of Aurora for the alleged waste of that corporation’s assets.
The defendant contends that the plaintiffs’ judgment against the corporation has been fully satisfied, and, therefore, plaintiffs may not maintain this action against the directors.
A recital of the facts and of the legal proceedings already had is necessary. Plaintiffs heretofore sued to foreclose a mortgage given by Aurora Holding…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Honeyman v. HananNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- In Re the Accounting of JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Westerbeke v. Bank of Huntington & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Westerbeke v. Bk. of Huntington and Tr., TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Rossbach v. Aurora Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3Cited by21 opinions
- O'Dowd v. American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Schmidt v. Magnetic Head Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Ripley v. StorerNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Allen v. StroughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- First State Insurance v. J & S United Amusement Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.