Legal Opinion

Agofsky v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 12, 2014No. 12-6311PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner John Doe,1 a federal prisoner, filed this first habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and an almost identical post-conviction relief application in state court, challenging the constitutionality of a prior Oklahoma state court conviction based on evidence of actual innocence. He also filed a motion to abate this § 2254 action pending state court exhaustion of his claims. The district court dismissed his habeas petition without prejudice, adopting the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation and holding that a stay under Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Armando Mena v. David LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Fontenot v. CrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  3. Michael Bynoe v. Isidro BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Postelle v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. Sena v. KennewayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API