Legal Opinion

Brands v. Cassedy

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 11, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill in this case was filed for the purpose of partitioning a certain farm in the township of Knowlton, Warren county, New Jersey, of which David C. Brands died seized, intestate, leaving him surviving a widow, two daughters and one son all of whom are the parties in this suit.

The answer and counter-claim set up an oral contract between the parties alleging that thereunder, partition cannot be had at this time. Defendant also prays for an accounting of the income of the farm and of all personal property removed from the farm by the complainant.

At the hearing the only question presented…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1881
  2. Harrop v. ColeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
  3. Harrop v. ColeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
  4. Spinning v. SpinningSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
  5. Douma v. PowersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goodpasture v. GoodpastureNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  2. Wujciak v. WujciakNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  3. Drumm v. PavlickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API