Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Beck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1899No. 18,235PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Erom the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

Action by appellee against appellant for damages occasioned by the wrongful appropriation of a strip of land claimed by appellee. Demurrer' to complaint overruled. Motions to strike out parts of complaint, and to separate complaint into paragraphs, overruled. Answer in two paragraphs: The first being a general denial, and the second a special plea of twenty years occupancy by appellant and its predecessor and grantor, the TTnion and Logansport Railroad Company, adversely and under claim of title. Reply: (1) denial; and (2) that appellant and its predecessors and grantors never had possession…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Peck v. . MallamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. Prather v. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Goldberg v. . UtleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Pence v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Gill v. State ex rel. BoardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SimpsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Hagemann v. City of Mount VernonIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Portland Foundry & Machine Co. v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Bloech v. Hyland Homes Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Butt v. IffertIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API