Legal Opinion

Nadal v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided July 7, 2011No. 14-09-00756-CRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARTHA HILL JAMISON, Justice.

Appellant, Katherine Michelle Nadal, appeals from her conviction for causing serious bodily injury to a child. She raises seven issues on appeal, contending: (1) the evidence is legally insufficient to sustain the verdict, (2) the evidence is factually insufficient to sustain the verdict, (3) the evidence is legally insufficient to sustain the jury’s finding that she used a deadly weapon in commission of the offense, (4) the trial court erred in admitting certain photographs into evidence, (5) the prosecution engaged in a pattern of misconduct throughout…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Trent Mason v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  2. Brandon Joseph Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Xavier Shrod Dukes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Orellana v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API