Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Muller

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1962No. 530PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Jack A. Hayes and Milton H. Knox, instituted this suit against Fritz J. Muller primarily for a money judgment for two-thirds of the amount which defendant is alleged to have received from the sale or assignment of a certain oil, gas and mineral lease. In the alternative, plaintiffs demand that defendant be ordered to make an accounting of all rentals, royalties and profits earned pursuant to a contract of joint adventure which is alleged to have been entered into by plaintiffs and defendant, and that defendant be ordered to pay unto each of the plaintiffs one-third of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. McDuffie v. WalkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana v. GlassellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  3. Reagan v. MurphySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  4. McCann v. ToddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  5. Scurto v. Le BlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hayes v. MullerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  2. Hayes v. MullerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Treadaway v. LaporteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Guiffrida v. BourqueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Fancher v. RumseySupreme Court of Florida · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API