Legal Opinion
Hayes v. Muller
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 15, 1971No. 3239PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Jack Hayes and Milton Knox, instituted this suit for a money judgment against defendant, Fritz J. Muller, based on quasi contract, quantum meruit and/or defendant’s unjust enrichment. The suit was later dismissed as to Hayes, leaving Knox as the sole plaintiff. Judgment was rendered by the trial court maintaining an exception of prescription of ten years filed by defendant, and dismissing the suit. Plaintiff Knox has appealed.
The issues presented here are: (1) Was the prescription pleaded by defendant interrupted by the filing of another suit by plaintiff in 1960? (2)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hayes v. MullerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Hope v. MadisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- National Surety Corp. v. Standard Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- Jackson v. American Employers' Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Lunkin v. Triangle Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trahan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Trahan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Kreher v. TL James & Company, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Grant v. PolitzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Mr. And Mrs. Theodore Norris, Sr. v. Bell Helicopter-Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.