Legal Opinion

Archie v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 29, 1998No. 72, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this case, we take the occasion to clarify the rule regarding the scope of impeachment evidence. That issue arises on the cross-appeal of the State that calls into question the extent to which Rule 609(a) of the Delaware Uniform Rules of Evidence (“D.R.E.”) permits inquiry into a witness’ prior criminal history for impeachment purposes. We hold that D.R.E 609(a), like the virtually identical federal counterpart, Fed.R.Evid. 609(a), allows inquiry on cross-examination beyond the issue of whether a witness has been convicted of a felony or a crime of dishonesty. We hold…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Leacock v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  2. United States v. Noah Ryan Robinson and John Anthony Robinson, and Noah Robinson v. United States of America, and John A. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Francis Harry Brown, A/K/A Harry Brown, United States of America v. Marvin GreenblattCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Scott M. FawleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Calvin Wayne Dow, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  2. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  3. Hull v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  4. State v. MobleySuperior Court of Delaware · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API