Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Hui
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 5, 1991No. C-90-1863 DLJPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JENSEN, District Judge.
This motion came on for hearing on August 14, 1991. Norman Blears appeared for nominal defendant Everex Systems, Inc. Alan Mansfield appeared on behalf of plaintiff John C. Johnson, Jr. For the reasons described below, nominal defendant Everex System, Inc.’s motion to terminate further litigation of plaintiff Johnson’s shareholder derivative claim is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND.
This motion arises in the context of a securities fraud suit initiated by plaintiff John C. Johnson (“Johnson”) on behalf of himself and derivatively on behalf of Everex Systems, Inc. (“Everex”).…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,860 Athalie Doris Joy v. Nelson L. North, Nelson L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,000 Ora E. Gaines v. D. J. Haughton, Lois A. And James Fitzpatrick v. D. J. HaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re UnitedHealth Group Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Einhorn v. CuleaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Oracle Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
- Patrick v. Alacer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- In Re Oracle Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.