Legal Opinion

Filipponio v. Bailitz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 13, 1978No. 76-1672PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Linn

Plaintiffs, Rocco and Dawn Filipponio (second buyers), sued defendants and third-party plaintiffs, Ronald and Helen Bailitz (first buyers), in the underlying action for damages arising out of alleged fraudulent representations regarding flooding made in connection with the sale of the subject residential property. The first buyers filed a third-party complaint for indemnification (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110, par. 25), to recover from third-party defendants, John and Elaine Katakis (original owners), damages in the amount of the second buyer’s claim against them. On appeal from the entry of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Joe Grasso & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Gertz v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Muhlbauer v. KruzelIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Index Fund, Inc. v. HagopianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  5. Reith v. General Telephone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. BrockmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. FioriniIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Scott & Fetzer Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Vicorp Restaurants v. Corinco Insulating Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Ketcham v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API