Legal Opinion

Druhe Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Fischbein

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 17, 1907No. Nos. 15,069-(31)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action in the district court for Ramsey county against the St. Paul Furniture Company and others to recover a carload of lumber or $934.24, the value thereof. The case was tried before Hallam, J., who directed a verdict in favor of defendants and that defendant, Haskell G. Fischbein, is entitled to a recovery of the property. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action in claim and delivery for certain lumber alleged to be wrongfully detained by defendants. The trial court directed a verdict for defendants, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial.

The facts are as follows: On May 4, 1905, plaintiff, a corporation under the laws of the state of Missouri, doing business at St. Louis, that state, sold to the St. Paul Furniture Company, a corporation doing business at St. Paul, this state, the lumber in question, and shipped' the same on that day by railroad from St. Louis to the furniture company at St. Paul. At the time of ordering the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Covell v. HeymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  3. Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Winchester v. HeiskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Winchester, Trustee, and Others v. Heiskell and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Corey v. PaineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API