Legal Opinion

Gilliland v. Motorola, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided March 4, 2005No. C.A. 411-NPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LAMB, Vice Chancellor.

I

In an earlier opinion, this court found that a majority stockholder breached its fiduciary duty by making incomplete disclosures in a notice of short-form merger sent in connection with the second step of a two-step going-private transaction. That opinion left unresolved what relief might be available to remedy this misconduct. The plaintiff, a former stockholder, now moves for an order determining that the proper form of relief is a class-based “quasi-appraisal” on behalf of all stockholders whose shares were exchanged for cash in the freeze-out merger.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  2. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. M.G. Bancorporation, Inc. v. Le BeauSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  4. Thorpe by Castleman v. Cerbco, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  5. Aspen Advisors LLC v. United Artists Theatre Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Proctor v. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. In re Orchard Enterprises, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  3. Berger v. Pubco Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  4. In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
  5. Christopher D. Mannix v. PlasmaNet, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API