Gilliland v. Motorola, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LAMB, Vice Chancellor.
I
In an earlier opinion, this court found that a majority stockholder breached its fiduciary duty by making incomplete disclosures in a notice of short-form merger sent in connection with the second step of a two-step going-private transaction. That opinion left unresolved what relief might be available to remedy this misconduct. The plaintiff, a former stockholder, now moves for an order determining that the proper form of relief is a class-based “quasi-appraisal” on behalf of all stockholders whose shares were exchanged for cash in the freeze-out merger.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- M.G. Bancorporation, Inc. v. Le BeauSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
- Thorpe by Castleman v. Cerbco, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Aspen Advisors LLC v. United Artists Theatre Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Proctor v. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In re Orchard Enterprises, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
- Berger v. Pubco Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
- Christopher D. Mannix v. PlasmaNet, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.