Legal Opinion
In Re Carter
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 24, 1989No. 19-21541PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
M. DEE McGARITY, Bankruptcy Judge.
PROCEDURE
This matter comes before the court on the motion of Attorneys Ludwig & Shlimo-vitz, S.C. to be appointed attorney for the debtor-in-possession under 11 U.S.C. § 327(a). The United States Trustee objected on the grounds that the law firm does not qualify in that it took as collateral for attorney fees an assignment of a land contract vendor’s interest in real estate owned by the debtors. The debtors’ interest was also subject to a prior assignment to a bank, also for collateral purposes. Be cause of this assignment, the United States Trustee…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Larry T. & Cynthia J. Martin D/B/A a & W Drive-In Restaurant & Martin's Exxon, Debtors. Appeal of Larry T. & Cynthia J. MartinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
- In Re Automend, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988
- In Re MartinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1986
- In Re Shah International, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1988
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re NovitzkeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1990
- Meeker v. Germeraad (In Re Quincy Air Cargo, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1993
- Michel v. Carter (In Re Carter)District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1990