Legal Opinion

State v. Patterson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The defendant was indicted and brought to trial on a charge of larceny by embezzlement. It seems from the bill of exceptions that he was at one time in the employment of the Hartman & Thompson Bank, and there, without authority, gave the money of that concern to an individual who failed to repay the same. To cover his default in the matter, the defendant borrowed money from one Osier to the extent of $3,500 with which he made good his shortage. He then took employment with another bank. In time, Osier, knowing of his former shortcomings, applied to the defendant for money to be paid him out…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State v. RamseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. State v. WestlakeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Long v. LanderOregon Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shannon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  2. State v. ToscanoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. Frasher v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. State v. EllisOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API