Himmelman v. Des Moines Insurance
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court.— Hon. E. E. Gay-nor, Judge. The opinion states the case. At the close of the evidence for both parties, there was a directed verdict and judgment in favor of defendants, and plaintiff appeals. — 1
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
1 conversion oí. Íouct and evidence.' There was warrant in the evidence for the finding of a state of facts as follows: In August, 1903, A. Hoyer, doing business at Oto, this State, took out a policy °£ fir® insurance in the defendant company insuring his stock of goods in . the sum of $500. The policy was taken out through the defendant M. A. Clark, a recording agent of the company at Sioux City. On March 7, 1904, the insured property was destroyed by fire. Hoyer was at the time indebted to plaintiff in a sum exceeding $500, and on March 9, 1904, he executed and delivered to plaintiff a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bond v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Schrader v. HooverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- United States National Bank v. CrosleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Petersen v. OchsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Knowlton v. LendrumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
3Cited by3 opinions
- Russell v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Hart v. Oregon Laundry Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Youngblood v. City of Mason CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1914