Legal Opinion
In re Keough
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 25, 1942PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.
The candidates of the Communist Party, appearing specially, challenge the jurisdiction of the court to hear the objections to the independent nominating petition that have been made in this proceeding.
*2The Secretary of State has ruled that the Communist Party nominating petition is valid on its face. The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court has reversed the injunction heretofore granted by this court restraining the Secretary of State during the pendency of this proceeding from certifying the nominees designated in the Communist nominating petition (Matter of Keough [Amter], 264 App. Div.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sweeney v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. . DakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Hurley v. TuckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Fink v. WallachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Matter of Farrell v. MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. BrancazioNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1960
- Grace v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- Kinebrew v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Verity v. CristenfeldNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- In re KeoughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.