Legal Opinion

Stone Logging & Contracting Co. v. International Woodworkers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

The problem presented by the pleadings and evidence may be stated as follows: Each of two rival unions claims to be the representative designated by a majority of plaintiff’s employees for the purpose of collective bargaining. Consequently, each of them claims the right to act as sole collective bargaining agency for all of the employees of the company. The A. F. of L. union, which had in the past acted as bargaining agency, contracted with the employer that it should be the sole collective bargaining agency for all of the employees. The employee members of the C. I. O. did not by any act…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  2. R. H. White Co. v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Markham & Callow, Inc. v. International WoodworkersOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Schwab v. Moving Picture MacHine Operators Local No. 159Oregon Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gilbertson v. Culinary Alliance & Bartenders' UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Sloan v. Journal Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Peters v. Central Labor CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. State of Oregon Ex Rel. v. DobsonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API