Rose v. . Bryan
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by plaintiffs from Ward, J., at March Term, 1911, of Nash. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Chief Justice Ciarle.
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, 0. J.
On 7 November, 1908, the defendant 0. Sadler made an assignment of all his property, including this lot of land and dwelling-house, for the benefit of creditors, specifying therein that the trustee should reserve and set apart his homestead exemption in said lot. On 28 December, 1908, Sadler conveyed said lot to his wife without any consideration. Soon thereafter the plaintiffs docketed their judgments.
The court' set aside the conveyance to the wife as void in regard to the plaintiffs, but adjudged that the debtor, 0. Sadler, was entitled to have his homestead set apart in said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crummen v. . BennetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- Chadbourn Sash, Door & Blind Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Arnold v. . EstisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Rankin v. . ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Dortch v. . BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hyman v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Watters v. . HedgpethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Stokes v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Bristol Grocery Co. v. BailsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936