Legal Opinion

Burgett v. Haynes

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1991No. 79A02-9102-CV-70PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTEAU, Judge.

Jason Burgett appeals the trial court's judgment in his favor and against Joseph Haynes and Blaine Hession on Burgett's claim for damages as a crime victim. Bur-gett raises the following four issues:

1. Whether the trial court erroneously failed to award damages for lost earnings;

2, Whether the trial court's award of damages is inadequate;

3. Whether the trial court erroneously failed to make the judgment against Haynes and Hession joint and several; and,

4. Whether the trial court erroneously failed to award attorney fees.

We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

FACTS

On July…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoesel v. Cain Kahler v. CainIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Templeton v. Sam Klain & Son, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. White v. Indiana Realty Associates IIIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Roake v. ChristensenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harco, Inc. of Indianapolis v. Plainfield Interstate Family Dining AssociatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Browning v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Ballard v. HarmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Wysocki v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Steve Silveus Insurance, Inc. v. GoshertIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API