State v. Curmon
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Defendant, Keithen Alexander Curmon, appeals his conviction for first-degree arson. For the reasons discussed herein, we find no error.
The evidence presented at trial tended to show that Sharon Bethea and defendant had a romantic relationship, which ended in the fall of 2002. Following their breakup, the two remained on relatively friendly terms. However, when Ms. Bethea began dating David Rochelle, defendant began harassing both of them with unwanted phone calls. Ms. Bethea told defendant not to contact her any further. Defendant continued to call her house attempting to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. FritschSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. HyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. CanadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. MeadowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. AllahCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. PettigrewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.