Legal Opinion

Sommer v. Sommer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 20, 1997No. 87159Published

1Opinion of the Court

947 P.2d 512 (1997)

1997 OK 123

Nicholas A. SOMMER, Respondent,

v.

Kay L. SOMMER, Petitioner.

No. 87159.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

October 14, 1997.

As Corrected October 20, 1997.

Eric J. Groves, Groves & Tague, Oklahoma City, for Petitioner.

Gomer Smith, Jr., Oklahoma City, for Respondent.

SUMMERS, Vice Chief Justice.

¶1 Our state constitution provides that "Imprisonment for debt is prohibited, except for the non-payment of fines and penalties imposed for the violation of law." Okla. Const.Art. 2 § 13. The question before us is whether that provision is violated when past due court-ordered alimony…

2Cases cited100 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API