Legal Opinion

O'Connell v. Freedom of Information Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 3, 1999No. AC 17870PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVERY, J.

The plaintiffs2 appeal from the Superior Court’s dismissal of their appeal from the freedom of *375information commission’s decision requiring them to produce requested records and imposing civil penalties on them. The plaintiffs claim that the Superior Court improperly determined that the commission did not abuse its discretion in concluding (1) that they were required to disclose the requested records to the complainants because they concerned public matters rather than “fraternal or social matters,” (2) that Public Acts 1996, No. 96-83 (P.A. 96-83), was not intended to apply…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Town of West Hartford v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Department of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. Dortenzio v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. Bridgeport Firefighters Ass'n, IAFF, Local 834 v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. Yantic Volunteer Fire Co. v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Director, Retirement & Benefits Services Division v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Murphy v. Conn., State Dept. of Educ., No. Cv 99 0498476s (Jul. 5, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API