Legal Opinion
Mason H. Rose v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 5, 1993No. 91-56332Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
988 F.2d 121
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Mason H. ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 91-56332.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 1993.
Decided March 5, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CV-87-8458-JGD, John G. Davies, District…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sagadin v. RipperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.