Legal Opinion

Primio v. Haertter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1934No. Appeal 365PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trbxler, P. J.,

This is an action of trespass for the recovery of damages resulting .from the colliding .of two motor trucks. Plaintiff came to the crossing, looked and saw defendant’s truck Í00 feet away coming at a rate of 30 or 35 miles per hour. He continued to cross the street which was about 35 to 40 feet wide, and when almost across he looked again and saw defendant’s truck 50. feet away. His last look was too late to avoid the collision with the defendant’s truck and the latter struck plaintiff’s vehicle in the extreme rear. Evidently the plaintiff took an obvious risk. He…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brayman v. DewolfSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McMillan v. Mor Heat Oil & Equip. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Lochhead v. NierenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Coventry v. KeithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Williams v. Philadelphia Toilet & Laundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Furia v. PerriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API