Legal Opinion

Yurteri v. Artukmac

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 11, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a hybrid action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is the owner of 50% of the outstanding shares of the defendant Fast Enterprises, Ltd., and a proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1104-a for the dissolution of Fast Enterprises, Ltd., the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), dated March 22, 2004, as denied that branch of his motion which was pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate a prior order of the same court dated August 19, 2002 granting the defendants’ unopposed motion…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Piton v. CribbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Ortega v. Bisogno & MeyersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Montefiore Medical Center v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Forward Door of New York, Inc. v. ForladerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Goody v. LloydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API