Lucent Information Management, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Dissent
ACKERMAN, Senior District Court Judge,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent from the opinion of my learned colleagues. I agree that the majority has correctly identified the issue in this case, i.e., what constitutes “use” sufficient to establish a common law trademark. Because, however, I believe there are genuine issues of material fact which preclude entry of summary judgment on this record, I would reverse the summary judgment of the district court. I write also to clarify the process by which district courts should resolve common law trademark disputes.
LTI moved for summary judgment of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Scott Paper Company, a Corporation v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- The Paddington Corporation v. Attiki Importers & Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.