Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lucent Information Management, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 3, 1999No. 98-7203Published

1Dissent

ACKERMAN, Senior District Court Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the opinion of my learned colleagues. I agree that the majority has correctly identified the issue in this case, i.e., what constitutes “use” sufficient to establish a common law trademark. Because, however, I believe there are genuine issues of material fact which preclude entry of summary judgment on this record, I would reverse the summary judgment of the district court. I write also to clarify the process by which district courts should resolve common law trademark disputes.

LTI moved for summary judgment of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Scott Paper Company, a Corporation v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. The Paddington Corporation v. Attiki Importers & Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API