Legal Opinion

Doty v. Walling

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1911No. 16,994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Finney district court.

1Per curiam

On its face the appellant’s title to the land, based, as it is, upon a patent from the state and a deed from the patentee to him, is complete and entitles him to judgment unless the appellee was in a position to attack it by proving that he was a new purchaser of the land and that the patent conveyed no title for the reason that all rights of the appellant’s grantor had been forfeited.

It is evident that the return of service by the sheriff on the notice of forfeiture was insufficient to effectuate a forfeiture. By the provisions of chapter 373 of the Laws of 1907 (Gen. Stat. 1909, §§…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. NewlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Hopper v. NationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Mayse v. BeltSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Mayse v. BeltSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Clapper v. SkeenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Himes v. GarmonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API