Legal Opinion

Abel v. Diking & Drainage Improvement District No. 4

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1943No. 29111PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiffs brought action seeking to have certain diking and drainage improvement district assessments and maintenance charges canceled of record, and the title to the lands affected thereby quieted in the plaintiffs. Upon a trial by the court, a decree was entered granting the relief prayed for in the complaint. Defendants, comprising the diking and drainage improvement district and its commissioners, appealed.

Respondents, A. M. Abel and May R. Abel, are husband and wife and are the present owners in fee simple of forty acres of vacant and unoccupied land lying wholly within the corporate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Spokane & Eastern Branch of Seattle First National Bank v. Justice Court for Spokane PrecinctWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Baldwin v. FrisbieWashington Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Washington State Liquor Control Board v. Washington State Personnel BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Washington Federation of State Employees, Council 28 v. Office of Financial ManagementWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Pna v. State Dept. of Transp.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Peninsula Neighborhood Ass'n v. Department of TransportationWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. BeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1951

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API