Legal Opinion
Arakawa v. Japan Network Group
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 12, 1999No. 98 Civ. 9055(SHS)PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
STEIN, District Judge.
Defendants Japan Network Group (“JNG”) and Yoshiaki Iida have moved to compel arbitration of this employment dispute. That motion is granted because, as set forth below, a valid agreement to arbitrate was signed by plaintiff and because the Court finds that arbitration of plaintiffs Title VII claims should not be precluded simply because she may be required to pay a portion of the costs of the arbitration.
I. Background
Plaintiff Taeko Arakawa was employed by JNG, a New York corporation that broadcasts Japanese TV programs in North America, from 1992…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Clinton Cole v. Burns International Security ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Susan M. ROSENBERG, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC. and John Wyllys, Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- LILLIAN PEBBLES MORRISON v. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., MARK F. SHANKLE, SR. v. PEP BOYS — MANNY, MOE & JACK, INC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- John Bruce Bradford v. Rockwell Semiconductor Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Lagatree v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Raniere v. Citigroup Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Patterson v. Raymours Furniture Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.