Legal Opinion
Urological Surgery v. Fecteau Benefit
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 2, 2005No. CV-04-422-JDPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Urological Surgery v . Fecteau Benefit CV-04-422-JD 03/02/05 P UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Urological Surgery Professional Association, et a l . v. Civil N o . 04-422 JD Opinion N o .
2005 DNH 037
Fecteau Benefits Group, Inc. and William Mann Company O R D E R Urological Surgery P.A. (“USPA”), USPA Money Purchase Pension Plan and Trust, USPA Profit Sharing Plan and Trust, and Edward A . Chibaro, M.D., collectively USPA, bring an action against Fecteau Benefits Group, Inc., and William Mann Company, alleging that they breached fiduciary duties owed under the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Michael Spielman v. Genzyme Corp. And Genzyme Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Gorski v. New Hampshire Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Lincoln House, Inc. v. Paul W. DupreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Kenton Capital, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.