Legal Opinion
Hardy v. 3 UNKNOWN AGENTS
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 9, 2010No. CV 05-4520-MMM (MAN)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, all of the files and records herein, the Amended Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, and the Objections filed by defendants. The time for filing Objections had passed and no Objections have been filed by plaintiff. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and the findings, conclusions, and recommendations therein.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Perez v. Denver Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2017
- (PC) Jackson v. MerrittDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Anderson v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Arellano v. GuldsethDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Arrant v. ZambranoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.