Legal Opinion

United States v. Phillip E. Naugle

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1993No. 92-4154PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff United States appeals the district court’s order granting defendant Phillip E. Naugle’s motion to suppress a shotgun found in a search of his home. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731.

I

In February 1989, the Utah County Sheriffs Department was investigating defendant’s service of process and investigations business, known as Search Investigations, Inc. The department had been told that defendant was illegally using Utah County Constable stationery in his business, that he was performing illegal wiretaps, and that he had been involved in a kidnapping…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Janus Industries, Doing Business as Acapulco Smoke Shop, and James B. JanusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Lang, S.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. BenoitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API