Legal Opinion

Grommes v. Town of Aurora

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 4, 1962No. Gen. 11,548PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEAL, J.

John H. Grommes and Harry Schoger sued the Town of Aurora and its highway commissioner, Carl Schwartz, for damages resulting from a highway improvement which plaintiffs alleged interfered with the drainage of their farm lands. A jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff Grommes for $1120 and awarded Schoger the sum of $4000. Judgment was entered on each verdict jointly against the defendants, Town of Aurora and Carl Schwartz, as highway commissioner. Defendants’ post-trial motions were denied, and this appeal followed.

On appeal defendants contend that the court erred in admitting improper…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The People v. WoodruffIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Richman Chemical Co. v. LowenthalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  3. Maton Bros. v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Goodman v. Motor Products Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  5. St. Louis Merchants' Bridge Terminal Ry. Ass'n v. SchultzIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Husted v. Thompson-Hayward Chemical Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  2. Tarshes v. Lake Shore Harley DavidsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Richardson v. ScrogghamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Sullivan v. Norton (In re Norton)District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API