Legal Opinion
In re the City of Utica
New York County Courts
Decided June 28, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHanagan, J.
This is a motion by William B. Weaver for an order opening his default in answering the above action, setting aside the judgment entered therein on August 18, 1943, canceling of record certain deeds, and bringing in certain party defendants.
On May 1, 1943, the City of Utica commenced an action in rem pursuant to title 3 of article VII-A of the Tax Law for the foreclosure of certain tax liens on several parcels of real property in the city of Utica including a parcel of land assessed to said William B. Weaver and described on the tax maps of the City of Utica at that time as book 7, map 11,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of New Rochelle v. Echo Bay Waterfront Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- City of New Rochelle v. Echo Bay Waterfront Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
- City of New Rochelle v. Echo Bay Waterfront Corp., New York County Courts1943
- City of Utica v. ProiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- City of Utica v. ProiteNew York Supreme Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- 149-155 Swan Street Corp. v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- Maryland Casualty Company v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Netter v. WillseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976