City of New Rochelle v. Echo Bay Waterfront Corp.
New York County Courts
1Opinion of the CourtCoyhe, J.
The plaintiff, City of New Rochelle, moves for summary judgment in an action in rem brought for the summary foreclosure (Tax Law, art. VII-A, tit. 3, § 165 et seep) of certain tax liens. The matter has previously been before the court in various forms. On the last occasion the court directed the Echo Bay Waterfront Corporation to state separately and number its alleged affirmative defenses. The amended answer now contains thirteen separate and distinct affirmative defenses. The first affirmative defense is simply a conclusion of law that the list or complaint fails to state facts sufficient…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Porter v. . WaringNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Cherubino v. MeenanNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Ex Parte J. B. Elmendorf v. Mayor of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1841
- Lynbrook Gardens, Inc. v. UllmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- City of Utica v. ProiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- City of Newark v. YeskelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- People v. Reilly, New York County Courts1976
- People v. Kirk, New York County Courts1969
- People v. LoftonNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. EstradaNew York Supreme Court · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.