Legal Opinion

Twenty-First Century Rail v. Njt

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 3, 2011No. A-0975-10T3PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

17 A.3d 213 (2011)

419 N.J. Super. 343

TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY RAIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, and

Frontier-Kemper/Shea/Bemo, Joint Venture, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORP., Defendant, and

PB Americas, Inc., f/k/a/ Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., Defendant-Respondent.

No. A-0975-10T3.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 5, 2011.

Decided February 3, 2011.

Paul W. Killian (Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Lowenstein Sandler, PC, attorneys; Steven E. Brawer, on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Lasalle National Bank and Lake Properties Venture v. County of Lake and the Village of GrayslakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  4. Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  5. Reardon v. Marlayne, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carreno v. City of NewarkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
  2. Twenty-First Century Rail Corp. v. New Jersey Transit Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API