Legal Opinion

Osterholme v. Osterholme

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 16, 1973PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Defendant husband appeals from the denial of his motion to terminate, or modify, the alimony payments required of him under a divorce decree.

The parties to this appeal were divorced in 1968. The decree ordered the defendant to pay “$100.00 per month by way of alimony for a period of ten years and one month * *

On January 19, 1972, defendant filed his motion to modify the decree by deleting the alimony requirement. In his supporting affidavit, the defendant asserted a material deterioration in his financial position resulting from a loss in pay, and from his remarriage. He also alleged an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hurner v. HurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Strickland v. StricklandOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Abraham v. AbrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Verburg v. VerburgCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. Howser v. HowserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harder v. HarderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of FrothinghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. Bridges v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. Case v. CaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. Scriven v. ScrivenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API