Legal Opinion

Mattz v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1988No. S002805PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARGUELLES, J.

In 1981, the People filed criminal charges against Diane Sue Mattz, Antone Folkins and Kenneth Mattz (hereafter defendants) —three Yurok Indians of the Hoopa Valley Indian Reservation in Northern California—arising out of defendants’ alleged commercial fishing activities in the Klamath River on the reservation.1 Before trial, defendants challenged the state’s authority to pursue the prosecutions, and in 1984, while this writ proceeding was pending in the Court of Appeal, we held in People v. McCovey (1984) 36 Cal.3d 517 [205 Cal.Rptr. 643, 685 P.2d 687] that the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  2. Parravano v. BabbittDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
  3. In Re SerranoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re SerranoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Mattz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API