Legal Opinion

Mattz v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1988No. S002805Published

1Opinion of the Court

46 Cal.3d 355 (1988)

758 P.2d 606

250 Cal. Rptr. 278

DIANE SUE MATTZ et al., Petitioners,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEL NORTE COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

Docket No. S002805.

Supreme Court of California.

August 22, 1988.

COUNSEL

George Forman and Dohn Henion, under appointments by the Supreme Court, Alexander & Karshmer, William Follett, Schafer, Cochran & Follett, Michael S. Pfeffer, Stephen V. Quesenberry and Steven Hirsh for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Steve White, Chief Assistant Attorney General, R.H. Connett, Assistant…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API