Legal Opinion

Miner v. Stolts

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 4, 1895PublishedCited by 7 opinions

, Appeal from city court, general term. Action by Henry C. Miner against Jonas Stolts and others. From a judgment of the city court (30 H. Y. Supp. 1133) affirming a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendants appeal.

1Per curiam

This is an action to recover the contract price of an electric light plant claimed by the plaintiff to have been sold by him to the defendants. . The answer was a general denial. The evidence given on the part of the defense was that the plant was purchased, not from the plaintiff, but from one May, to whom, at the beginning of the negotiations, the plaintiff referred the defendant in these words: “I will have nothing to do with it. You deal with Mr. May. Whatever Mr. May will do with you, it is all right.”

The judge charged as follows:

“If you find the evidence that that statement [referring…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tooley v. . BaconNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Height v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Peninsula House, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Abbott v. Beth Israel Cemetery Ass'n of WoodbridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Medinets v. HansenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  4. State v. PaulNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API