Legal Opinion

Medinets v. Hansen

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 16, 1954PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

33 N.J. Super. 237 (1954)

109 A.2d 675

ALFRED MEDINETS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

OTTO HANSEN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 1, 1954.

Decided November 16, 1954.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. Arthur J. Sills argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman, Spitzer & Sills, attorneys).

Mr. Huyler E. Romond argued the cause for the respondents, Otto Hansen and Herbert J. Jensen.

Mr. Duboise S. Thompson for respondents, The Mayor and Council of the Borough of Metuchen.

2Per curiam

The Building Inspector of the Borough…

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Burt v. Advertiser Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Livingston v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. Taylor v. Inhabitants of CaribouSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
  4. Langbein v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  5. Alexander v. PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neighbors on Upton Street v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Foos v. Lower Merion Township Zoning Board of Adjustment, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API